RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?)

Subject: RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
From: "Bonnie Granat" <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:30:02 -0400



I consider "references" to be any persons who can comment on my professional
abilities and accomplishments. They do not need to be managers from
companies at which I have worked. All that's required is that they know my
professional abilities and accomplishments and be able to describe them
appropriately orally or in writing.


Bonnie Granat | http://www.GranatEdit.com
bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com
Cambridge, Massachusetts, US



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l


---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: References (was: Why discuss certification?): From: Wilcox, Rose

Previous by Author: RE: Technical writing in South Florida?
Next by Author: Project 11 and Certification: A Possibility
Previous by Thread: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)
Next by Thread: Re: References (was: Why discuss certification?)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads