RE: who vs that

Subject: RE: who vs that
From: "Nuckols, Kenneth M" <Kenneth -dot- Nuckols -at- mybrighthouse -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:21:45 -0400


Claire said...

>
> How about a *definitive* source, such as Garner's Modern American
Usage
> (or even Strunk and White)?
>
> Garner says: (page 836, section D)
> "Who is the relative pronoun for human beings (though that is also
> acceptable); that and which are the relative pronouns for anything
other
> than humans, including entities created by humans."
>

Okay this debate reminds me of another word choice issue that always
drives me batty when I hear it. It's probably not "wrong" but it sure
sounds incorrect to my ears.

It's the "called" vs. "named" issue.

Example:
"The CEO was called John Smith." Any time I read something like this
where a person is "called" and then it lists their name, it just sounds
so wrong and ignorant. I would argue that there's no option, exception,
or exemption for not writing or saying it as "The CEO was NAMED John
Smith."

I would argue that when referring to people "called" should never be
used when referring to a person's name; it should only be used when
giving some descriptive character ("called brave," "called brash"), or
nickname ("called Skippy by his college chums"). The funny thing is, it
doesn't bother me when I hear the reverse--such as using "named" with a
title or honorarium. An example of that might be, "...whom Time magazine
named Person of the Year."

But is this just one reader's/listener's prejudice, or is there really
some rule as to when you should use "called" or "named" when referring
to someone and giving their name, a nickname, a character trait, or some
sort of title or honorarium?

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, purge it and do not disseminate or copy it.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Invoicing
Next by Author: RE: Resume Services
Previous by Thread: RE: who vs that
Next by Thread: RE: who vs that (called vs named)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads