TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Word numbering best practice question? From:"Chinell, David F \(GE Indust, Security\)" <David -dot- Chinell -at- GE -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, "Brierley, Sean" <Sean -dot- Brierley -at- ipc -dot- com> Date:Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:17:50 -0500
Sean:
Do you mean you can't use a SEQ field? It's just a field, not a "reference field" and it's no less "fieldish" than a cross-reference or caption numbering field.
Aside from that, I think both Dave Knopf's (excellent) solution and using the Numbered tab limit you to a single-level procedural list (which is not a bad thing).
IF you must have multiple levels, then you need to force your writers to type in the substep letters manually (also not bad, as it discourages substeps) OR go with the Outline Numbered tab.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-