TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: A Survey: Do You Name Your Images in a Std Way?
Subject:RE: A Survey: Do You Name Your Images in a Std Way? From:"zzPinkham, zzJim" <Jim -dot- Pinkham -at- voith -dot- com> To:"Fred Ridder" <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>, <CMartinek -at- zebra -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Thu, 24 May 2007 09:55:27 -0500
Not sure I'm completely convinced on Point 1 (or that I need to be). But
Points 2 and 3 make very good sense. I inherited the Fig_X system (right
down to the memo from the head of engineering directing it), but this
thread definitely points to a better way. We've got the unique
identifiers without the Fig_X stuff. So who needs it? Just another
evidence that time on this list is often well spent.
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+jim -dot- pinkham=voith -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Fred Ridder
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:29 AM
To: CMartinek -at- zebra -dot- com; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: A Survey: Do You Name Your Images in a Std Way?
I *totally* agree about avoiding filenames that include the figure
number. In the first place, it inherently denies the possibility that
the file might be used in more than one publication or more than one
context. Second, it really adds very little informational value. And
third, if you add or delete a figure you render most (or all) of the
existing filenames inaccurate.
Fred
>From: "Martinek, Carla" <CMartinek -at- zebra -dot- com>
>To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
>Subject: RE: A Survey: Do You Name Your Images in a Std Way?
>Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 09:00:16 -0500
>
>-----Original Message-----
>So, where we're at now is something more along the lines of
>Fig_10-1_XYZ_10_Rotating_Assembly.eps. At this point, we at least have
>a fighting chance of turning up what we need quickly in a search or a
>visual scan of filenames.
>---------------------------
>
>
>One question... What happens when you add a new figure, and Fig_10 now
>becomes Fig_11 in your doc?
>
>Perhaps there is a way that it can work for some groups, but I've
>avoided naming graphics by their figure numbers for as long as I can
>remember for just such a reason.
>
>-Carla
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-