TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Employment question From:<richard -dot- melanson -at- us -dot- tel -dot- com> To:<admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 26 Jun 2007 13:27:11 -0400
I find this question distasteful and I feel posting it insults the people of TechWR-L. I do not post very often but I feel the need to comment on this.
What are you TechWriters against the world. If you cannot accept someone with a different political view who you openly acknowledge has ALL it takes to do the job, how do you accept edits, constructive criticisms, suggestions, or any other concept that you may disagree with.
Diversity is what makes the planet spin, it is what makes the US great. Diversity makes the living experience wonderful. I want to meet new people with different ideas, who are of different colors, who are of different ethnic backgrounds, who have different ideals, who have different morals, who have different sexual concepts, who have different religious concepts, and who can introduce me to a new concept or idea and make me better for meeting them. Just reading that someone or a group of someones is considering not hiring a person because of worries about political views I find disgusting.
Hire this person and what did the commercial say, "Make this world a better place" and make yourself better people.
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+richard -dot- melanson=us -dot- tel -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+richard -dot- melanson=us -dot- tel -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of TECHWR-L Administrator
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:42 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: FWD: Employment question
Forwarded anonymously on request. Please respond on list--
no responses will be privately forwarded. TECHWR-L Admin
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
We are a five person documentation group at a mid-sized company. I
started here as a lone writer eight years back. The team grew to its
current size, over the years as the need arose. Though I have the final
say in the selection of a new writer, the team members are involved in
the screening and interviewing process, and the final decision is a
consensus.
We are a pretty close-knit team, and fit in together well. Though each
writer works on individual books and products, the rest of the team
pitches in whenever necessary, like in a crunch at release time or when
some one needs time-off with a scheduled release coming up. Our regular
table in the cafeteria is called the Doc Table where people stop by to
chat us up. Of course, we do enjoy our private jokes about the rest of
the company... :-)
Now we are in need of another writer and have been going through a round
of interviewing. Been a bit frustrating till we found the ideal
candidate. Articulate, good language skills, in-depth knowledge in our
technologies, friendly nature... The interviewing team were exchanging
gratified smiles till we took the candidate for lunch.
The contrast in views couldn't have been any greater. And the person was
not the least bit reluctant to express them either. Like it was a given
that no one could ever disagree with those opinions. (Did I tell you our
team all fall into the same side of the political spectrum?) The visible
strain the team was under to keep the situation from sliding to an Al
Franken date with Ann Coulter would have made me smile if I was not
under the same strain.
The question is, would it be ethical to deny employment to a person
(otherwise eminently qualified) based on his/her political views, though
the real reason is never mentioned? On the other hand, is a new person
(however well qualified) worth the possible disruption (97% possibility)
to the sense of good will in the team?
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as richard -dot- melanson -at- us -dot- tel -dot- com -dot-
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
