Re: The case against M$ Word

Subject: Re: The case against M$ Word
From: "Chris Morton" <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Gary Schnabl" <gSchnabl -at- livernoisyards -dot- com>, techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:03:44 -0700

Re: FM longevity....that's *exactly* the way I see it, Gary.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Gary Schnabl
<gSchnabl -at- livernoisyards -dot- com>wrote:

> Combs, Richard wrote:
> > Gary Schnabl wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Duh! Seek out a reputable eBay "merchant" and not a used-camel dealer.
> >> There are a number there on eBay who pick up and resell unregistered,
> >> legal copies of proprietary software.
> >>
> >
> > Adobe's full retail price for FM 8 is $899. A quick Ebay search
> > (http://tinyurl.com/5fjbsf) revealed that the reputable merchants are
> > selling unused copies of FM 7.0 (3 versions old) for $575 - $750. That
> > doesn't strike me as particularly cheap. If you intend to upgrade from
> > that, it makes no sense at all.
> >
> > Oddly, somebody's selling _upgrades_ to FM 8 for $342.78, above Adobe's
> > list price of $299.
> >
> > To be fair, you can get a "used" copy of FM 5.5 for UNIX for $199. And
> > the minimum bid for FM 3 for the NeXT is just $7.99. :-)
> >
> > Anyway, this discussion has been about making a case against MS Word to
> > one's superiors. So I assumed we were discussing corporate purchases for
> > technical writing staff, not personal purchases for home or free-lance
> > use. I doubt that too many corporations bigger than micro size would buy
> > their software from Ebay.
> >
> > Richard
> >
>
> It's a moot case for me about acquiring FrameMaker because I received a
> copy of FM 7 gratis through my employment as a technical editor with a
> semiconductor manufacturer over three years ago. Otherwise, I would have
> purchased my own version way before now. eBay or not. I typically find
> my legal software on eBay discounted by more than 50% from the "street"
> price. Occasionally, sellers need the money (any money) badly enough.
>
> I use FM for creating the printer's PDF for all medium to large books
> whether if their subdocuments were authored with Word or not. Conversion
> from Word is brain-dead simple. And I almost never use any direct
> formatting (manual overriding of Word styles).
>
> And Word 2007 is far better than Word 2003 for the purposes of technical
> writing or editing. Its typesetting algorithms are still better than
> what Word 2007 employs, but not near those what InDesign can do. I see
> few problems in using Word 2007, though, especially if styles are used
> everywhere in the documents. The final editor(s) could use the DTP
> packages for typesetting, and that part need not concern other writers
> or editors that use Word 2007.
>
> As to my believing that FrameMaker is nearing EOL: Adobe.com does not
> list FrameMaker among its 14 top-tier products on its home page.
> InDesign is among the top 14... To get to FrameMaker via linking from
> Adobe's home page, one must click on the More Products hyperlink. The
> next page then lists 12 major products, of which none is FrameMaker. To
> finally get to FrameMaker 8, one must click on a More Products hyperlink
> a second time and select FrameMaker 8 via a drop-down menu.
>
> Adobe will continue to include more bug fixes from FM 8 (FM 7.1, and 7.2
> to a smaller extent, was essentially a bug fix that needed to be paid
> for...) and incorporate enough new "features" in order to justify or
> entice its users to pay for an upgrade or two. After a passage of time,
> there will few reasons to offer both InDesign and FrameMaker as separate
> standalone apps because Adobe will place a higher priority on InDesign
> due to competition. Ergo, InDesign CSx will coopt FrameMaker's remaining
> functions and users, and FrameMaker will be dropped.
>
> Gary
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
> solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
> HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
> http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
> authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
> once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!
> http://www.helpandmanual.com/
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/salt.morton%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
The case against M$ Word: From: Chris Morton
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Gary Schnabl
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Combs, Richard
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Gary Schnabl
RE: The case against M$ Word: From: Combs, Richard
Re: The case against M$ Word: From: Gary Schnabl

Previous by Author: Re: The case against M$ Word
Next by Author: RE: injecting a little whimsy into grey text
Previous by Thread: Re: The case against M$ Word
Next by Thread: RE: The case against M$ Word


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads