TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: active vs. passive From:Karin Matchett <wordcraft -at- karinmatchett -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Sat, 5 Aug 2017 07:48:26 -0500
I agree. In addition to needing a form of "to be," it needs an explicit
subject.
The question of active vs. passive doesn't even apply to this sentence
because it's a command, which only has an implied subject of "you." My
sense of why the question of passive voice is coming up is that there
are different ways to phrase this sentence that are differently
direct/indirect/confusing/obtuse/imprecise. These have a similar feel
to active/passive, but they're not the same thing -- there's no
overlap.
Karin
On 8/4/2017 7:23 PM, Robert Lauriston wrote:
Since the subject specifically refers to active vs. passive, I'll
repeat what I said in that long thread, only correctly (it has been a
long and busy day):
A phrase in passive voice has to have a form of the verb "be" and a
past participle. There's more to it, but without those, it's not
passive voice.
Garner's "Modern American Usage" has good explanations for things like that.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and conte
nt development | [1]http://techwhirl.com
1. http://techwhirl.com/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com