Re: Why disguise f**r-letter w*rds?

Subject: Re: Why disguise f**r-letter w*rds?
From: Jan Jackson <jjackson -at- SUSQ -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 14:44:59 EST

It could be to tone down the impact or to relinquish responsibiltiy
for using a vulgar phrase. The latter case is somewhat like using "sic."

< I have seen many messages that have used "f*ck" or "f--k" or some other
< variation. (...) Does anyone know how this practice got started
< (and why it continues?) - Brian Boisvert

Jan Jackson
Documenation Manager


Previous by Author: Lotus's WordPro
Next by Author: Re: PAINTSHOP PRO
Previous by Thread: Re: Why disguise f**r-letter w*rds?
Next by Thread: Re: Why disguise f**r-letter w*rds?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads