Re: Inappropriate interview....(Long but I'm venting so it's ok)

Subject: Re: Inappropriate interview....(Long but I'm venting so it's ok)
From: Pat Gantt <pagantt -at- POSTOFFICE -dot- WORLDNET -dot- ATT -dot- NET>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 07:18:53 -0500

> the argument for sans serif fonts is indefensible.

Not really. According to research san serif fonting
is far more readable. Afterall, in the main, we *are* shooting for
simplicity. If the audience can't easily read the message...
the message is lost.

Serif merely "appears" to be more "business-like."
Hang over from the typewriter mentality.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Best Regards,

Pat Gantt, VoTech Guide
Personal email ~ pagantt -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net
The University of Tennessee, M.S. HRD
VoTech Guide ~ The Mining Company
Business Mail ~ votech -dot- guide -at- miningco -dot- com
http://votech.miningco.com
GO VOLS! Don't ask Peyton who!

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: ? "Technical" = Male ?
Next by Author: Re: Examples of bad technical writing
Previous by Thread: Re: Inappropriate interview....(Long but I'm venting so it's ok)
Next by Thread: Re: Inappropriate interview....(Long but I'm venting so it's ok)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads