TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Editorial Against PDFs (long) From:Tracy Boyington <tracy_boyington -at- OKVOTECH -dot- ORG> Date:Fri, 6 Mar 1998 08:48:32 -0600
Well, everybody's entitled to their own opinion, but one at least hopes
for a little consistency.
So first this Gibbs guy says:
> Why use PDF? The fact that an electronic document can "look'' like a =
> real document doesn't make it more valid. If it is electronic, it is =
> electronic.=20
If it's electronic then it's electronic. I agree with that. But he
follows immediately with:
> In the case of vendors, I'm at a complete loss as to why they supply =
> their manuals in PDF. Is it laziness? Is it because they can print their =
> documentation that is laid out for paper directly to the PDF driver =
> rather than go to the trouble of creating a specifically electronic =
> version?=20
PDF *rather than* electronic? So now PDF is NOT electronic?
> That doesn't make a lot of sense. The vendors could just as easily =
> export the document to HTML, which would be generally more useful.=20
Just as easily? Puh-leeze. I've done both, and exporting a document to
HTML is not even close!!!
> Of course, it may be that vendors figure that their deathless prose has =
> such great intrinsic value that the hoi polloi shouldn't be able to cut =
> and paste it.
Or it may be that vendors realize their product is protected by
copyright and don't feel the need to make easier for anyone to violate
that copyright.
> PDF files are a hangover, a retro technology that serves to keep us in =
> the data age. The data age? Yep, that's what we're struggling out of. =
> The data age was an era when just to get access to any content was an =
> incredible step forward.=20
I find it interesting that Lisa's customers apparently aren't ready for
PDF yet, but this Gibbs guy calls it retro. What is it -- too old or too
new?
But, like I said, everybody is entitled to their own opinions. Although
I don't have a whole lot of respect for people who anonymously leave
their opinions in one's mailbox.