Re: Resume Revision

Subject: Re: Resume Revision
From: Laurence Burrows <burrows -at- IBM -dot- NET>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 12:52:35 +1100

Keith Bennett wrote:

--------------snip
I thought recruiters were supposed to supply the client with the resume the
technical writer furnished (I worked long and hard hours on developing this
resume mind you) and I was disappointed that they would alter my resume
almost beyond my recognition. What happened?
--------------snip

The saddest words in the job recruitment dance -- "I thought..."

Recruiters / lawyers / publishers / etc. do whatever they believe will
improve their net billable hours. And, many are just lazy and will reduce
any problem to whatever fits onto a page. To believe otherwise is to
mis-understand commercial reality.

Whenever you brief recruiters / lawyers / publishers to do a task, ask to
see their submission / draft / blueline before you sign it off. If you
don't insist on content oversight, don't be surprised when the outcome
reflects their agendas, not yours.

Regards,

....................................................
Laurence Burrows, Navex Pty Ltd
mailto:burrows -at- ibm -dot- net, 100026 -dot- 172 -at- compuserve -dot- com
tel: +61 3 9602 4533 fax: +61 3 9602 4854
....................................................


From ??? -at- ??? Sun Jan 00 00:00:00 0000=



Previous by Author: Re: ethical problem/job hunting
Next by Author: Fed Up...and Printing Plate choices
Previous by Thread: Resume Revision
Next by Thread: Re: Resume Revision


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads