Re: Mixing metaphors?

Subject: Re: Mixing metaphors?
From: Janice Gelb <Janice -dot- Gelb -at- Sun -dot- COM>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:48:35 +1100

On Jan 29, 2010 8:32AM, Deborah Hemstreet wrote:
> Wow, a lot of food for thought...
>
> Well, here is the context:
>
> However, increased XXX capacity can be a two-edged sword. On one hand,
> it significantly enables lower cost functionality. But on the other
> hand, the increasing complexity and cost of XXX designs has prevented
> many vendors from using, or taking full advantage of, the capabilities
> of XXX.
>
> MUDDIER and muddier, one hand is good, the other is bad... and if I CUT
> you with a two-edged sword you are more seriously wounded than with a
> single-edged sword...
>

I must admit that I'm a little surprised that
more people haven't heard of this metaphor,
which I otherwise would have thought was fairly
common. The usage is accurate here: the meaning
of the metaphor as I've always heard it is that
a two-edged sword has the potential of cutting
both the target and the wielder of the sword.

I'd have ordinarily said to leave it: the meaning
of the metaphor is actually correct in context and,
as someone else said, the one hand/other hand usage
is so common that readers aren't likely to perceive
it as continuing the sword metaphor. However, as
a few people don't seem to be familiar with the
metaphor, if it really bothers you, you might
consider changing this to:

"However, increased XXX capacity has both
benefits and drawbacks. On one hand..."

If you want to substitute one metaphor for
another, you could use instead "a mixed
blessing" :->

-- Janice

***********************************************************
Janice Gelb | The only connection Sun has with
janice -dot- gelb -at- sun -dot- com | this message is the return address
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
Fonts for translation: From: Chinell, David F (GE EntSol, Security)
Re: Fonts for translation: From: Julie Stickler
RE: Fonts for translation: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: Fonts for translation: From: Leslie Turriff
Mixing metaphors?: From: Deborah Hemstreet
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Milan Davidović
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Tony Chung
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Deborah Hemstreet

Previous by Author: Re: Mixing metaphors?
Next by Author: RE: what's the going price
Previous by Thread: Re: Mixing metaphors?
Next by Thread: Re: Mixing metaphors?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads