Re: Mixing metaphors?

Subject: Re: Mixing metaphors?
From: quills -at- airmail -dot- net
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:01:51 -0600

Actually, the dropping of the word sword is a short-cut. The actual
reference is a double-edged sword. A sword that can cut on the
fore-stroke and the back-stroke, one that can cut you as well as the
target. And in the cited instance it is a parallel metaphor. One good,
one bad, just as in a double-edged sword.

There are things that can be double-edged and not a threat to the user.

My razor for instance has 3-edges.

:)

Scott

On 1/29/10 1:33 AM, Geoff Lane wrote:
> On Friday, January 29, 2010, Deborah Hemstreet wrote;
>
>> Wow, a lot of food for thought...
>
>> Well, here is the context:
>
>> However, increased XXX capacity can be a two-edged sword. On one hand,
>> it significantly enables lower cost functionality. But on the other
>> hand, the increasing complexity and cost of XXX designs has prevented
>> many vendors from using, or taking full advantage of, the capabilities
>> of XXX.
>
>> MUDDIER and muddier, one hand is good, the other is bad... and if I CUT
>> you with a two-edged sword you are more seriously wounded than with a
>> single-edged sword...
>
>> The client wants this a INFORMAL and UNTECHNICAL as possible (ARGH)!
> ---
>
> Just to throw in another wobbly: I'd not heard a of a "two-edged
> sword" until this thread. Where I live, it's "double-edged", which is
> in the OED with the meaning, "adj. presenting both a danger and an
> advantage." So if you leave out the word "sword" you're left with
> correct English and a single metaphor, viz:
>
> However, increased XXX capacity can be double-edged. On one hand, it
> significantly enables ...
>
> HTH,
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
Fonts for translation: From: Chinell, David F (GE EntSol, Security)
Re: Fonts for translation: From: Julie Stickler
RE: Fonts for translation: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: Fonts for translation: From: Leslie Turriff
Mixing metaphors?: From: Deborah Hemstreet
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Milan Davidović
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Tony Chung
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Deborah Hemstreet
Re: Mixing metaphors?: From: Geoff Lane

Previous by Author: Re: how bad is the job market? New job requirements (ACK!!)??
Next by Author: RE: what's the going price
Previous by Thread: Re: Mixing metaphors?
Next by Thread: Re: Mixing metaphors?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads