[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

Re: P&P suggestions

Subject: Re: P&P suggestions
From: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 18:05:43 -0400

So my humorous take on this matter was pretty much on target, eh?

Ever ask a government agency for permission for something? Years ago I asked in June about holding an August event in a park. In October I got a reply, "No permission is necessary."

In this case I'm sure the thought would be, "No index is necessary. We already know where everything is."

If you search my county government's website for information about horses (which are forbidden, I believe, in the county's parks) you get only a pointer to a document that happens to contain the word "horseshoe," which is part of the name of a location within the county. Searches for some other items bring up acres of raw HTML.

Jay will be hard pressed to come up with anything that's actually better than whatever the customer has now. Fortunately nobody will care, nor will anybody complain to or about him.

On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:33:30 -0400, Jay Maechtlen <techwriter -at- laserpubs -dot- com> wrote:

On 9/19/2014 1:20 PM, Keith Hood wrote:
What's wrong with providing an index?
On Friday, September 19, 2014 2:37 PM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> wrote:

That would make a lot of sense.
Did I mention this is for a government?

Each Policy, AO, and Procedure will be a standalone document.
I am working totally remote, and can't even see their intranet.
So, they will have to figure out findability themselves.

Ah - I need to ask them how AO numbers are determined, and see if we can reserve a block for this project.
Ditto Procedure numbers (or whatever identifiers they use.)

fun, fun, fun.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1lRPd2l

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives

Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: P&P suggestions: From: Peter Neilson
Re: P&P suggestions: From: Keith Hood
Re: P&P suggestions: From: Jay Maechtlen

Previous by Author: Re: P&P suggestions
Next by Author: Re: P&P suggestions
Previous by Thread: Re: P&P suggestions
Next by Thread: Re: P&P suggestions

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads